Sylvestre's blog - Derniers Commentaires le Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/?disp=comments fr-FR http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 Witek [Visiteur] en réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:54:53 +0000 Witek [Visiteur] c29386@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/ <p>Can you provide search by package name or source package name on clang.debian.net? It will make easier to check if packages I care is affected. Also package size comparission (before and after compressing into .deb, and default ones from Debian) of this packages which successed would be usefull.</p> <p>Another question: what architecture you was using? amd64? How about i386? It should be equally easy (in terms of access to building virtual machines), and when considering metrics like package (binary) sizes changes beetween clang and gcc, it can give better insight into any changes.</p> Can you provide search by package name or source package name on clang.debian.net? It will make easier to check if packages I care is affected. Also package size comparission (before and after compressing into .deb, and default ones from Debian) of this packages which successed would be usefull.

Another question: what architecture you was using? amd64? How about i386? It should be equally easy (in terms of access to building virtual machines), and when considering metrics like package (binary) sizes changes beetween clang and gcc, it can give better insight into any changes.

]]> https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang#c29386 Marc Driftmeyer [Visiteur] en réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:32:46 +0000 Marc Driftmeyer [Visiteur] c29350@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/ <p>All this whining about LLVM/Clang. What a joke. The quality of architecture alone, nevermind the contributions by hundreds of architect level quality developers of compiler expertise is producing a far superior product to GCC.</p> <p>You get all of this for free.</p> <p>You get CUPS for free. Nothing is stopping any Distribution of Linux to pair up the quality of CUPS with that of Apple.</p> All this whining about LLVM/Clang. What a joke. The quality of architecture alone, nevermind the contributions by hundreds of architect level quality developers of compiler expertise is producing a far superior product to GCC.

You get all of this for free.

You get CUPS for free. Nothing is stopping any Distribution of Linux to pair up the quality of CUPS with that of Apple.

]]> https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang#c29350 Kartik [Visiteur] en réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:46:03 +0000 Kartik [Visiteur] c29349@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/ <p>dd-list will be cool addition :)</p> dd-list will be cool addition :)

]]> https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang#c29349 sylvestre [Membre] en réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:16:37 +0000 [Membre] c29348@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/ <p>@Jonas: Right, I will do it!</p> @Jonas: Right, I will do it!

]]> https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang#c29348 Jonas Smedegaard [Visiteur] en réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:13:26 +0000 Jonas Smedegaard [Visiteur] c29347@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/ <p>Would be nice with per-package-maintainer web pages.</p> <p>Also, per-package web pages and (poking Paul Wise to add) links from packages.qa.debian.org summary pages would be awesome.</p> Would be nice with per-package-maintainer web pages.

Also, per-package web pages and (poking Paul Wise to add) links from packages.qa.debian.org summary pages would be awesome.

]]> https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang#c29347 sylvestre [Membre] en réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:00:23 +0000 [Membre] c29346@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/ <p>Sylvain:<br /> <a href="http://clang.debian.net/scanlog-3.0-2012-01-12" class="linebreak" rel="nofollow ugc">http://clang.debian.net/scanlog-3.0-2012-01-12</a></p> <p>with clang 2.9<br /> <a href="http://clang.debian.net/scanlog-2.9-2011-09-11" class="linebreak" rel="nofollow ugc">http://clang.debian.net/scanlog-2.9-2011-09-11</a></p> Sylvain:
http://clang.debian.net/scanlog-3.0-2012-01-12

with clang 2.9
http://clang.debian.net/scanlog-2.9-2011-09-11

]]> https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang#c29346 Sylvain Le Gal [Visiteur] en réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:57:27 +0000 Sylvain Le Gal [Visiteur] c29345@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/ <p>Can you give a list of all packages with their errors. </p> <p>I am trying to find (OCaml) packages with error and it will be useful to have all the problematic packages on the same pages, whatever their error is.</p> <p>Thx</p> Can you give a list of all packages with their errors.

I am trying to find (OCaml) packages with error and it will be useful to have all the problematic packages on the same pages, whatever their error is.

Thx

]]> https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang#c29345 Ralf [Visiteur] en réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:42:03 +0000 Ralf [Visiteur] c29344@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/ <p>At least LLVM is developed by people from different companies, while gcc is at least 90%, probably more, developed by a single company: Google.</p> At least LLVM is developed by people from different companies, while gcc is at least 90%, probably more, developed by a single company: Google.

]]> https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang#c29344