<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/7.2.5-stable" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sylvestre's blog - Derniers Commentaires le Removal of sun-java6 from Debian </title>
		<link>https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=794" />
		<description></description>
		<language>fr-FR</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=7.2.5-stable"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title> azhag [Visiteur] en réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_29234">azhag</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visiteur]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c29234@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;1) OK, will do once i get back home.&lt;br /&gt;
2) Sure, OpenJDK 7 may be more than credible, but there a still some things that requires (or works better with) Java from Oracle. I&amp;#8217;m not  forcing anyone to do so, just showing how this issue with retiring DLJ can be possibly solved.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) OK, will do once i get back home.<br />
2) Sure, OpenJDK 7 may be more than credible, but there a still some things that requires (or works better with) Java from Oracle. I&#8217;m not  forcing anyone to do so, just showing how this issue with retiring DLJ can be possibly solved.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2011/10/25/removal_of_sun_java6_from_debian#c29234</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>admin [Membre] en réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="login user nowrap" rel="bubbletip_user_1"><span class="identity_link_username">admin</span></span> <span class="bUser-member-tag">[Membre]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c29233@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;1) Yes, please fill a bug&lt;br /&gt;
2) Here, the difference with the flash issue is that we have an alternative which is more than credible (openjdk 7)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Yes, please fill a bug<br />
2) Here, the difference with the flash issue is that we have an alternative which is more than credible (openjdk 7)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2011/10/25/removal_of_sun_java6_from_debian#c29233</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> azhag [Visiteur] en réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_29232">azhag</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visiteur]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c29232@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;1. You promote openjdk-7-jre, but it seems that the icedtea-plugin supports only openjdk-6-jre. Can I use openjdk-7 as a plug-in browser (if not with the current version of icedtea-plugin, maybe with icedtea7-plugin)? I can fill a bug if necessary, just wanted to ask if there&amp;#8217;s a point to do that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2. Perhaps the issue of non-free Java can be solved like issue of non-free Flash [1] &amp;#8211; package with script that download Java from the upstream&amp;#8217;s page and installs  it (java-package [2] may be recycled).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href=&quot;http://packages.debian.org/sid/flashplugin-nonfree&quot; class=&quot;linebreak&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;http://packages.debian.org/sid/flashplugin-nonfree&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[2] &lt;a href=&quot;http://packages.debian.org/lenny/java-package&quot; class=&quot;linebreak&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;http://packages.debian.org/lenny/java-package&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. You promote openjdk-7-jre, but it seems that the icedtea-plugin supports only openjdk-6-jre. Can I use openjdk-7 as a plug-in browser (if not with the current version of icedtea-plugin, maybe with icedtea7-plugin)? I can fill a bug if necessary, just wanted to ask if there&#8217;s a point to do that.</p>

<p>2. Perhaps the issue of non-free Java can be solved like issue of non-free Flash [1] &#8211; package with script that download Java from the upstream&#8217;s page and installs  it (java-package [2] may be recycled).</p>

<p>[1] <a href="http://packages.debian.org/sid/flashplugin-nonfree" class="linebreak" rel="nofollow ugc">http://packages.debian.org/sid/flashplugin-nonfree</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://packages.debian.org/lenny/java-package" class="linebreak" rel="nofollow ugc">http://packages.debian.org/lenny/java-package</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2011/10/25/removal_of_sun_java6_from_debian#c29232</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Cùran [Visiteur] en réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_29230">Cùran</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visiteur]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c29230@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I&amp;#8217;m a little bit torn about the news, because while I clearly prefer OpenJDK, it can&amp;#8217;t do everything the proprietary Java version could, most importantly for me: &lt;a href=&quot;http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=588&quot; class=&quot;linebreak&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=588&lt;/a&gt; (ok, it might not OpenJDK directly but the browser plugin).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As I&amp;#8217;ve the last Oracle version that was distributed installed and can switch between the two browser plugins with three clicks, I don&amp;#8217;t care _too_ much, but it&amp;#8217;d be nice if you&amp;#8217;d cautioned users, that purging might have them going through the snapshots service in case they&amp;#8217;re forced to use a service like ElsterOnline&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m a little bit torn about the news, because while I clearly prefer OpenJDK, it can&#8217;t do everything the proprietary Java version could, most importantly for me: <a href="http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=588" class="linebreak" rel="nofollow ugc">http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=588</a> (ok, it might not OpenJDK directly but the browser plugin).</p>

<p>As I&#8217;ve the last Oracle version that was distributed installed and can switch between the two browser plugins with three clicks, I don&#8217;t care _too_ much, but it&#8217;d be nice if you&#8217;d cautioned users, that purging might have them going through the snapshots service in case they&#8217;re forced to use a service like ElsterOnline&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2011/10/25/removal_of_sun_java6_from_debian#c29230</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Elessar [Visiteur] en réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_29229">Elessar</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visiteur]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c29229@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I think &lt;code&gt;apt-get install --purge openjdk-7-jre&lt;/code&gt; would be more appropriate, in order to avoid removing packages that depend on Java.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think <code>apt-get install --purge openjdk-7-jre</code> would be more appropriate, in order to avoid removing packages that depend on Java.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2011/10/25/removal_of_sun_java6_from_debian#c29229</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Jonathan Carter [Visiteur] en réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_29228">Jonathan Carter</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visiteur]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c29228@https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Good riddance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good riddance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<link>https://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/2011/10/25/removal_of_sun_java6_from_debian#c29228</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
