Derniers Commentaires

Sylvestre

En réponse à: LLVM Debian/Ubuntu nightly packages

Sylvestre [Membre]
Yes: --enable-experimental-targets=R600

Search for ../configure in:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-llvm/llvm-toolchain/branches/snapshot/debian/rules?view=markup for the list of argument
PermalienPermalien 04.04.13 @ 17:26
sobkas

En réponse à: LLVM Debian/Ubuntu nightly packages

sobkas [Visiteur]
Does Radeon backend is enabled?
PermalienPermalien 04.04.13 @ 17:19
Jake

En réponse à: Some more cool stuff with LLVM/Clang

Jake [Visiteur]
"even if the error is obvious", make that plural. You can see it in the error report: "..is located 5 bytes inside of 80-byte region..". Why an 80 byte region for a 10 char array? Because it's allocating 10 char pointers, which, on 64-bit architecture, are 8 byte. The malloc should get (10 * sizeof(char)).
PermalienPermalien 13.01.13 @ 15:17
Robert

En réponse à: Some more cool stuff with LLVM/Clang

Robert [Visiteur]
Just as long as we don't get loads of half baked patches to "quieten AddressSanitizer" now (a la OpenSSL).
PermalienPermalien 13.01.13 @ 14:32
1052

En réponse à: Some more cool stuff with LLVM/Clang

1052 [Visiteur]
It is a Google development, and it will also be available in GCC 4.8
PermalienPermalien 13.01.13 @ 12:10
Elessar

En réponse à: Mini Debconf & merchandising

Elessar [Visiteur]
@MJ Ray: Fairtrade, I do not know, which is not particularly reassuring, but the short-sleeved polos are indicated to respect at least a textile quality standard called ?Eco-Tex?. The long-sleeved ones are not indicated to respect any specific standard though?
PermalienPermalien 22.11.12 @ 10:37
Sylvestre

En réponse à: Mini Debconf & merchandising

Sylvestre [Membre]
MJ Ray: I don't know, sorry :/
PermalienPermalien 18.11.12 @ 20:08
MJ Ray

En réponse à: Mini Debconf & merchandising

MJ Ray [Visiteur]
Is the cloth fairtrade? Does it avoid sweatshop cotton?

I wrote about this a while ago in http://www.news.software.coop/are-your-free-software-t-shirts-ethical/112/ and I'd be interested in a bluff if it's ethical and available to ship to England.

Oh and how do I tell this site to email me on new comments?
PermalienPermalien 17.11.12 @ 23:00
Elessar

En réponse à: Mini Debconf & merchandising

Elessar [Visiteur]
For those of you that may notice the very low quantity of rugby shirts we will have for sale, this is by design: as this kind of cloth is not very usual in our kind of community, and quite more expensive than the usual tee-shirts, we chose to get only a few of them to test how they will be appreciated.

Now, if it appears they are appreciated, do not worry, we will have more next time! :-)
PermalienPermalien 17.11.12 @ 20:54
Sylvestre

En réponse à: libc++: New C++ standard library in Debian

Sylvestre [Membre]
@Julien, it works for me ?! (both reader + planet)
PermalienPermalien 16.08.12 @ 13:45
Julian Andres Klode

En réponse à: libc++: New C++ standard library in Debian

Julian Andres Klode [Visiteur]
Nice post, but something is wrong with the planet.debian.org integration or with Google reader, as that leads me to

http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/xmlsrv/805@http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog

(your guid) when trying to open the blog, as reader seems to ignore and only respect elements.
PermalienPermalien 16.08.12 @ 12:42
Benjamin Kay

En réponse à: libc++: New C++ standard library in Debian

Benjamin Kay [Visiteur]
Congratulations! This is very helpful to those of us developing with C++11 and Clang on Debian!
PermalienPermalien 15.08.12 @ 14:40
Sylvestre

En réponse à: Interview in FLOSS for Science

Sylvestre [Membre]
Valio ??
PermalienPermalien 24.07.12 @ 19:15
Valio

En réponse à: Interview in FLOSS for Science

Valio [Visiteur]
Rss encoding is broken :(
PermalienPermalien 24.07.12 @ 19:11
Nadav

En réponse à: Who is in control of LLVM/Clang ?

Nadav [Visiteur]
I think that the number of commits is multiplied by 3.
Also, "Eli Friedman" is with Apple. "Owen Anderson" is with Apple. "Bruno Cardoso Lopes" is academic, AFAIK. "Reid Spencer" did most of his work before joining AutoESL (which is now Xilinx, I think).
PermalienPermalien 23.07.12 @ 11:58
jon

En réponse à: Who is in control of LLVM/Clang ?

jon [Visiteur]
The desperation in your voice is funny point.

I think you know perfectly well what the point is and your response proves it is valid!
PermalienPermalien 23.07.12 @ 03:21
point

En réponse à: Who is in control of LLVM/Clang ?

point [Visiteur]
What is your point? LIcense is owned by U of Illinois Code owners are all employed by Apple. None of the Google employees have contributed any significant code aside from Richard Smith. Apple also owns WebKit tradmark, OpenCL, libdispath, Objective C. Once again what is your point?
PermalienPermalien 23.07.12 @ 01:34
Sylvestre

En réponse à: Who is in control of LLVM/Clang ?

Sylvestre [Membre]
No, I didn't. I am using the email addresses registered in the LLVM VCS.
PermalienPermalien 23.07.12 @ 00:29
glandium

En réponse à: Who is in control of LLVM/Clang ?

glandium [Visiteur]
Did you also account for change of employment for those @gmail, etc.?
PermalienPermalien 23.07.12 @ 00:13
Samuel Orr

En réponse à: llvm & clang 3.1 in Debian unstable + GSoC

Samuel Orr [Visiteur]
Excellent. I have been trying out clang for a while as a replacement for gcc. It would be great to see better support for it in Debian.
PermalienPermalien 25.05.12 @ 13:20
Witek

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Witek [Visiteur]
Can you provide search by package name or source package name on clang.debian.net? It will make easier to check if packages I care is affected. Also package size comparission (before and after compressing into .deb, and default ones from Debian) of this packages which successed would be usefull.

Another question: what architecture you was using? amd64? How about i386? It should be equally easy (in terms of access to building virtual machines), and when considering metrics like package (binary) sizes changes beetween clang and gcc, it can give better insight into any changes.
PermalienPermalien 12.03.12 @ 00:54
Manuel

En réponse à: java-package: Replacement of sun-java6

Manuel [Visiteur]
the sun-java6 package seems also to be updated/available here :

https://github.com/rraptorr/sun-java6
PermalienPermalien 06.03.12 @ 14:57
mirabilos

En réponse à: java-package: Replacement of sun-java6

mirabilos [Visiteur]
This is… well, not great, but useful. Not great because, in my heart, I’m fully behind throwing it out. Useful because, to update mksh in Android AOSP, I need to be able to build and test-boot it – and Google is still depending on Sun J2SDK 6 for that.

I tried lenny’s package, but first had to patch it to accept two-digit patchlevels and amd64 packages, and THEN ran into the problem that update-java-alternatives didn’t like the result. At all. If this tool version does it better, I’m bought.

Merci!
PermalienPermalien 01.03.12 @ 22:37
Sylvestre

En réponse à: java-package: Replacement of sun-java6

Sylvestre [Membre]
Julian: apt-get install icedtea-web
See:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/icedtea-web.html
PermalienPermalien 01.03.12 @ 14:40
Julian Andres Klode

En réponse à: java-package: Replacement of sun-java6

Julian Andres Klode [Visiteur]
Not only corporations, also everyone wanting to use applets basically needs Oracle's Java build, as the free plugin basically does not work with many sites.
PermalienPermalien 01.03.12 @ 14:31
gebi

En réponse à: java-package: Replacement of sun-java6

gebi [Visiteur]
Thx for bringing java-package back!
Btw... i update the sun-java6 package regularly to make it work with the newest java 6 version.

https://github.com/gebi/sun-java6
PermalienPermalien 01.03.12 @ 13:31
Sylvestre LEDRU

En réponse à: java-package: Replacement of sun-java6

Sylvestre LEDRU [Membre]
Ubuntu is regularly synchronizing against Debian... So, it should come sooner or later.
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 23:44
aim

En réponse à: java-package: Replacement of sun-java6

aim [Visiteur]
any plans to include this into ubuntu?

PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 23:38
Marc Driftmeyer

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Marc Driftmeyer [Visiteur]
All this whining about LLVM/Clang. What a joke. The quality of architecture alone, nevermind the contributions by hundreds of architect level quality developers of compiler expertise is producing a far superior product to GCC.

You get all of this for free.

You get CUPS for free. Nothing is stopping any Distribution of Linux to pair up the quality of CUPS with that of Apple.
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 16:32
Kartik

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Kartik [Visiteur]
dd-list will be cool addition :)
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 15:46
Sylvestre LEDRU

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Sylvestre LEDRU [Membre]
@Jonas: Right, I will do it!
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 14:16
Jonas Smedegaard

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Jonas Smedegaard [Visiteur]
Would be nice with per-package-maintainer web pages.

Also, per-package web pages and (poking Paul Wise to add) links from packages.qa.debian.org summary pages would be awesome.
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 14:13
Sylvestre LEDRU

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Sylvestre LEDRU [Membre]
Sylvain:
http://clang.debian.net/scanlog-3.0-2012-01-12

with clang 2.9
http://clang.debian.net/scanlog-2.9-2011-09-11
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 14:00
Sylvain Le Gal

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Sylvain Le Gal [Visiteur]
Can you give a list of all packages with their errors.

I am trying to find (OCaml) packages with error and it will be useful to have all the problematic packages on the same pages, whatever their error is.

Thx
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 13:57
Ralf

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Ralf [Visiteur]
At least LLVM is developed by people from different companies, while gcc is at least 90%, probably more, developed by a single company: Google.
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 13:42
Anonym

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Anonym [Visiteur]
Clang is real threat to all free world cause of apple have its hands on it.
I hope clang not become a default compiler in linux distros. Do you know why BSD want to propose clang? They are hate GNU GPL license, thats it. There is no other real reason why do they refused to use gcc in their system. They can't understand, that GPL is good for both developers and users, while BSD good only for companies.
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 12:14
Sylvestre LEDRU

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Sylvestre LEDRU [Membre]
I have been following the llvm-commits mailing list for a while and Apple people are not doing half of the commits.

There are Google, academic, etc contributing on a daily bases...
For example, I didn't have issues to see my patches applied quickly (even the one for HURD).
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 08:46
Michael Biebl

En réponse à: Rebuild of the Debian archive with clang

Michael Biebl [Visiteur]
Now that Apple is gaining influence in the development of LLVM, don't you see a risk that it suffers the same fate as cups? See the recent developments of cups 1.6 wrt Linux.
PermalienPermalien 29.02.12 @ 02:53
azhag

En réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian

azhag [Visiteur]
1) OK, will do once i get back home.
2) Sure, OpenJDK 7 may be more than credible, but there a still some things that requires (or works better with) Java from Oracle. I'm not forcing anyone to do so, just showing how this issue with retiring DLJ can be possibly solved.
PermalienPermalien 27.10.11 @ 17:32
Sylvestre

En réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian

Sylvestre [Membre]
1) Yes, please fill a bug
2) Here, the difference with the flash issue is that we have an alternative which is more than credible (openjdk 7)
PermalienPermalien 27.10.11 @ 17:20
azhag

En réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian

azhag [Visiteur]
1. You promote openjdk-7-jre, but it seems that the icedtea-plugin supports only openjdk-6-jre. Can I use openjdk-7 as a plug-in browser (if not with the current version of icedtea-plugin, maybe with icedtea7-plugin)? I can fill a bug if necessary, just wanted to ask if there's a point to do that.

2. Perhaps the issue of non-free Java can be solved like issue of non-free Flash [1] -- package with script that download Java from the upstream's page and installs it (java-package [2] may be recycled).

[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/flashplugin-nonfree
[2] http://packages.debian.org/lenny/java-package
PermalienPermalien 27.10.11 @ 17:16
Cùran

En réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian

Cùran [Visiteur]
Well, I'm a little bit torn about the news, because while I clearly prefer OpenJDK, it can't do everything the proprietary Java version could, most importantly for me: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=588 (ok, it might not OpenJDK directly but the browser plugin).

As I've the last Oracle version that was distributed installed and can switch between the two browser plugins with three clicks, I don't care _too_ much, but it'd be nice if you'd cautioned users, that purging might have them going through the snapshots service in case they're forced to use a service like ElsterOnline...
PermalienPermalien 25.10.11 @ 13:16
Elessar

En réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian

Elessar [Visiteur]
I think apt-get install --purge openjdk-7-jre would be more appropriate, in order to avoid removing packages that depend on Java.
PermalienPermalien 25.10.11 @ 10:37
Jonathan Carter

En réponse à: Removal of sun-java6 from Debian

Jonathan Carter [Visiteur]
Good riddance.
PermalienPermalien 25.10.11 @ 03:46
mirabilos

En réponse à: sun-java6 packages removed soon from Debian/Ubuntu (and all other linux distros)

mirabilos [Visiteur]
Cool! +1 for OpenJDK being the only one, finally… (besides gcj, of course)
PermalienPermalien 31.08.11 @ 17:40
Cae

En réponse à: sun-java6 packages removed soon from Debian/Ubuntu (and all other linux distros)

Cae [Visiteur]
Thanks for the heads up.

Like Alexander E. Patrakov above mentioned, I can't get banking done with OpenJDK.

Any chance of a howto to help Debian users to properly install Oracle JDK?
PermalienPermalien 30.08.11 @ 03:17
Toni Mueller

En réponse à: sun-java6 packages removed soon from Debian/Ubuntu (and all other linux distros)

Toni Mueller [Visiteur]
Thanks for the heads-up!

It would certainly be good if someone could verify, and maybe ping intel & co, that all those Java-Web-Console applets (Webstart?) that modern hardware comes with, will run flawlessly with OpenJDK.
PermalienPermalien 29.08.11 @ 17:13
JulienW

En réponse à: sun-java6 packages removed soon from Debian/Ubuntu (and all other linux distros)

JulienW [Visiteur]
My only concern is about JNLP. Hope the WIP in OpenJDK will be usable soon :-)
PermalienPermalien 29.08.11 @ 08:00
eMBee

En réponse à: sun-java6 packages removed soon from Debian/Ubuntu (and all other linux distros)

eMBee [Visiteur]
i guess one could shed some tears about a non-free package becoming harder to install, but i hope this puts more pressure on fixing bugs in the openjdk.

i find it rather sad that after so many years of java being released under the GPL license that people are still prefering the non-free version.

greetings, eMBee.
PermalienPermalien 29.08.11 @ 03:07
Sylvestre

En réponse à: sun-java6 packages removed soon from Debian/Ubuntu (and all other linux distros)

Sylvestre [Membre]
Thanks for your input Tony ;)
PermalienPermalien 28.08.11 @ 15:36